Microhardness of dual-polymerizing resin cements and foundation composite resins for luting fiber-reinforced posts.

نویسندگان

  • Keiichi Yoshida
  • Xiangfeng Meng
چکیده

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM The optimal luting material for fiber-reinforced posts to ensure the longevity of foundation restorations remains undetermined. PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to evaluate the suitability of 3 dual-polymerizing resin cements and 2 dual-polymerizing foundation composite resins for luting fiber-reinforced posts by assessing their Knoop hardness number. MATERIAL AND METHODS Five specimens of dual-polymerizing resin cements (SA Cement Automix, G-Cem LincAce, and Panavia F2.0) and 5 specimens of dual-polymerizing foundation composite resins (Clearfil DC Core Plus and Unifil Core EM) were polymerized from the top by irradiation for 40 seconds. Knoop hardness numbers were measured at depths of 0.5, 2.0, 4.0, 6.0, 8.0, and 10.0 mm at 0.5 hours and 7 days after irradiation. Data were statistically analyzed by repeated measures ANOVA, 1-way ANOVA, and the Tukey compromise post hoc test (α=.05). RESULTS At both times after irradiation, the 5 resins materials showed the highest Knoop hardness numbers at the 0.5-mm depth. At 7 days after irradiation, the Knoop hardness numbers of the resin materials did not differ significantly between the 8.0-mm and 10.0-mm depths (P>.05). For all materials, the Knoop hardness numbers at 7 days after irradiation were significantly higher than those at 0.5 hours after irradiation at all depths (P<.05). At 7 days after irradiation, the Knoop hardness numbers of the 5 resin materials were found to decrease in the following order: DC Core Plus, Unifil Core EM, Panavia F2.0, SA Cement Automix, and G-Cem LincAce (P<.05). CONCLUSIONS The Knoop hardness number depends on the depth of the cavity, the length of time after irradiation, and the material brand. Although the Knoop hardness numbers of the 2 dual-polymerizing foundation composite resins were higher than those of the 3 dual-polymerizing resin cements, notable differences were seen among the 5 materials at all depths and at both times after irradiation.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Microhardness of dual-polymerizing resin cements and foundation composite resins for luting fiber-reinforced posts

Statement of problem. The optimal luting material for fiber-reinforced posts, to ensure the longevity of foundation restorations, remains undetermined. Purpose. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the suitability of 3 dual-polymerizing resin cements (DRCs) and 2 dual-polymerizing foundation composite resins (DFCRs) for luting fiber-reinforced posts by assessing their Knoop hardness number...

متن کامل

Microhardness of dual-polymerizing resin cements and foundation composite resins for luting fiber-reinforced posts

Statement of problem. The optimal luting material for fiber-reinforced posts, to ensure the longevity of foundation restorations, remains undetermined. Purpose. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the suitability of 3 dual-polymerizing resin cements (DRCs) and 2 dual-polymerizing foundation composite resins (DFCRs) for luting fiber-reinforced posts by assessing their Knoop hardness number...

متن کامل

"Evaluation of fracture strength of teeth restored with different types of posts luted with different luting cements": an in vitrostudy.

AIMS The aim was to evaluate the incidence of root fracture of endodontically treated teeth reinforced with glass-fiber posts and metal posts luted with different luting cements. MATERIALS AND METHODS Forty maxillary central incisors were sectioned at 1 mm of the cementoenamel junction and endodontically treated. The teeth were divided into four groups (n = 10) and restored with prefabricated...

متن کامل

Retentive force of three fiber-reinforced resin composite posts and a zirconia post cemented with two adhesive luting agents: in vitro study.

By means of a pull-out test, this study compared the retentive force of three fiber-reinforced resin composite posts and a zirconia post. These posts were cemented using two different dual-polymerizing adhesive resin luting agents. Forty freshly extracted canines were selected for the study. All tooth root were endodontically treated and the post spaces prepared. The posts were luted using luti...

متن کامل

Bonding Effectiveness of Two Adhesive Luting Cements to Glass Fiber Posts: Pull-Out Evaluation of Three Different Post Surface Conditioning Methods

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the bond strength at the post/resin-cement interface with 3 different surface treatments of glass fiber posts and with 2 different luting resin cements. Sixty glass fiber posts (RelyX Fiber Post) were randomly divided into 3 groups (n = 20) and were luted with a dual-polymerizing self-adhesive universal resin cement (RelyX Unicem) and with a dual-polyme...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • The Journal of prosthetic dentistry

دوره 111 6  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2014